Justice Served: A Tale of Calculated Vengeance

The life imprisonment of Punjilal Meher, a college lecturer convicted for the 2018 parcel bomb murder of a newlywed groom and his grandmother, closes a chapter on one of Odisha’s most chilling crimes. The case, which seemed plucked from a thriller, revealed the depths of human malice disguised under the veneer of respectability. Meher’s conviction after six years is a testament to the painstaking efforts of the Odisha Crime Branch, which pieced together a seemingly "blind" case with no eyewitnesses or initial suspects. The court’s verdict, though falling short of the death penalty sought by the victims’ family, delivers a measure of justice while exposing the grotesque consequences of professional envy.

While the verdict brings closure, legal experts suggest Meher may appeal, prolonging the ordeal for the grieving family. The defence could challenge forensic evidence or sentencing severity, but the overwhelming proof—including his own confession—makes overturning the conviction unlikely.

Meher’s motive—resentment over being replaced as principal by the victim’s mother—unfolded like a sinister plot. His method, a parcel bomb disguised as a wedding gift, was meticulously planned to evade detection. The bomb, mailed from another state under a fake name, exploited the trust inherent in celebratory gestures. The brutality of the act was compounded by its timing: the explosion tore through the family a day after the wedding reception, leaving the groom’s young wife critically injured. Such calculated cruelty challenges the perception of educators as custodians of morality, revealing how easily intellect can be weaponised.

The investigation’s breakthrough, hinging on an anonymous letter Meher himself sent to the police, underscores the paradox of criminal arrogance. His subsequent confession and demonstration of bomb-making—learned from online tutorials—added a modern, macabre twist. The case also highlights the evolving role of digital forensics, as detectives matched printer ink, adhesive, and other mundane details to irrevocably link Meher to the crime. Yet, the delayed justice—six years for a crime with such overwhelming evidence—raises questions about systemic delays that prolong victims’ anguish.

The cultural reverberations of the case, including the Odia film Mindgame, reflect society’s fascination with true crime, particularly when it involves betrayal by a figure of authority. Meher’s subsequent attempts to reinvent himself as a jailhouse teacher for inmates further blur the lines between redemption and narcissism. While the law has spoken, the case leaves lingering unease about the fragility of trust and the ease with which knowledge can be perverted. The court’s fine of ₹1.4 lakh feels paltry against the loss of two lives, but the life sentence ensures Meher’s notoriety will remain confined to prison walls. For Odisha, the case is a grim reminder that evil often wears a familiar face.

 A Looming Catastrophe: Trump’s aid cut increases concern

Concern over malaria, a disease deadlier than many others in Africa, particularly for children, has intensified following the Trump administration's decision to significantly cut foreign aid. With the malaria season beginning this month across large parts of Africa, the administration's move to terminate 90% of USAID's foreign aid contracts has local health officials warning of a potential catastrophe in some of the world's most vulnerable communities. USAID's stop-work orders, issued in late January, have forced many to focus on disaster preparedness. As the largest bilateral funder of anti-malaria efforts in Africa, the U.S. has played a critical role in providing anti-malarial medicines and insecticide-treated bed nets, which are essential for controlling the mosquito-borne disease. These supplies, likened to groceries in their necessity, are now at risk of severe shortages due to the aid cuts. As supplies dwindle, there is widespread fear of a surge in severe malaria cases later this year, including complications like organ failure.

A new modelling study by the Washington-based organisation Malaria No More reveals that just one year of disruption in the malaria-control supply chain could lead to nearly 15 million additional cases and 107,000 additional deaths globally. According to a WHO report, Africa's 1.5 billion people accounted for 95% of the estimated 597,000 malaria deaths worldwide in 2023. The withdrawal of most U.S. government support is expected to have a cascading effect, particularly in three of the most vulnerable countries: Nigeria, Congo, and Uganda. U.S. funding has traditionally been channelled through a network of non-governmental organisations, medical charities, and faith-based groups, making malaria prevention and treatment more accessible, often free, especially for rural communities.

Meanwhile, mosquito-spraying operations in remote areas, which were supposed to begin in February ahead of the rainy season when stagnant water becomes a breeding ground for malaria-carrying Anopheles mosquitoes, have been suspended. Already, long lines of malaria patients are a common sight outside clinics in many areas each year. Since 2011, the PMI has supported Nigeria's malaria response with nearly 164 million fast-acting medicines, 83 million insecticide-treated bed nets, over 100 million rapid diagnostic tests, 22 million preventive treatments for pregnant women, and insecticide for 121,000 homes. In Congo, U.S. government funding has contributed approximately $650 million toward malaria control since 2010. Now, some of the successes in fighting malaria in Congo are under threat, complicating already challenging efforts to identify and track disease outbreaks across the vast country as supplies and expertise for malaria testing are affected. The worsening conflict in eastern Congo, where some health workers have fled, has further raised the risk of infection, with little backup available.

Despite the dismantling of USAID's programs, health workers in Africa hope that some U.S. funding will continue through other channels, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. However, the Global Fund also relies on U.S. support and has yet to issue a public statement on the dramatic aid cuts. The Trump administration is being urged to reinstate these life-saving programs before malaria outbreaks spiral out of control. The stakes are high, and the consequences of inaction could be devastating for millions of people across the continent.

 

Recycling, Dumping, and E-Waste Management Solutions

The comforting notion that tossing a plastic bottle into a recycling bin ensures its rebirth as a new product is largely a myth. As Alexander Clapp’s Waste Wars reveals, much of what we discard embarks on a grim odyssey—shipped to developing nations where it pollutes landscapes, poisons rivers, and even re-enters the food chain through contaminated seafood.

The global waste trade, often masked as recycling, is a deeply flawed system that shifts the burden of Western overconsumption onto poorer nations. Western countries, particularly in Europe and North America, produce staggering amounts of plastic and electronic waste, only to export a significant portion under the guise of recycling. In reality, this waste is frequently downcycled into inferior products, burned as toxic fuel, or dumped in countries like Indonesia, Ghana, or Turkey, where weak regulations and desperate labour forces make them easy targets. The EU, for instance, recycles less than half of its plastic waste domestically, outsourcing the rest to places ill-equipped to handle it safely. 

The problem extends beyond plastics to electronic waste, another growing crisis of the digital age. Discarded computers and smartphones, sometimes falsely labelled as donations, end up in slums like Agbogbloshie in Ghana, where workers extract valuable metals using dangerous, primitive methods. These informal recycling hubs provide livelihoods but at a horrific cost, exposing workers and surrounding ecosystems to lead, mercury, and other deadly toxins. The global e-waste trade mirrors the same inequality seen in plastic waste: wealthy nations consume, while poorer ones bear the health and environmental consequences. 

Historically, when land dumping became politically inconvenient, waste was simply shipped elsewhere—sometimes even into the ocean, as with the infamous case involving the Liberian cargo ship, Khian Sea, which spent years searching for a place to dump Philadelphia’s incinerator ash before illegally dumping it at sea. More recently, speculative proposals to send waste into space have emerged, but these are neither practical nor ethical. The deep sea is already a plastic graveyard, and space dumping would only transfer pollution beyond Earth without addressing the root problem: overconsumption and poor waste management. 

Real solutions require systemic change. Exporting waste must be strictly regulated, not just through agreements like the Basel Convention but with enforceable penalties for violations. Wealthy nations must invest in domestic recycling infrastructure rather than relying on exploitative global trade. Companies should be held accountable for the full lifecycle of their products, incentivising durable, repairable designs over disposable ones. Most importantly, the world must move beyond the illusion that recycling alone can solve the waste crisis. Without reducing consumption and rethinking production, the waste wars will only escalate, leaving more communities and ecosystems buried under the weight of the world’s discarded excess. 

 Caste Politics: The Eternal Game of Power

Nothing suits politicians and those in power more than the caste issue, a tool wielded with precision for millennia. From ancient times to British rule, where "divide and rule" thrived on caste divisions, it has been central to India's power dynamics. In modern politics, caste equations dictate electoral strategies, with parties exploiting them for gains. The Mandal Commission's aftermath intensified this, embedding caste deeper into the political fabric. Now, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's push for a caste-based census has outmanoeuvred the opposition, forcing them to recalibrate their strategies.

The latest volley in this unending battle comes from Rahul Gandhi, who has reignited the debate with his "Not Found Suitable" (NFS) allegation. He claims that SC, ST, and OBC candidates are being systematically excluded from education and leadership roles under this pretext. While his charges are polemical, they are not new. Leaders like Union Minister and Apna Dal (S) President Anupriya Patel have previously flagged similar biases in government jobs. Gandhi's rhetoric, however, amplifies the narrative of constitutional betrayal, framing NFS as a modern-day "Manuvaad" undermining social justice.

Yet, such accusations often overlook systemic complexities. The "not found suitable" tag may reflect institutional inefficiencies rather than deliberate exclusion. While vacant reserved posts in universities and IITs demand scrutiny, reducing the issue to a BJP-RSS conspiracy oversimplifies it. Reservation was conceived as a tool for empowerment, but its politicisation risks reducing it to a tokenistic battleground.

The reservation system in India, designed as affirmative action to uplift marginalised communities, has deep historical roots. Its genesis can be traced back to 1882, when William Hunter and Jyotirao Phule advocated for educational reservations. The British formalised this with the 1933 Communal Award, introducing separate electorates for various communities. However, the Poona Pact of 1932, an agreement between Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, led to a unified Hindu electorate with reserved seats for the depressed classes. Post-independence, the Indian Constitution enshrined provisions to address historical injustices. Articles 15(4) and 16(4) empower the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backwards classes. Over time, amendments like the 77th, 81st, and 85th have expanded reservations to include promotions and address unfilled vacancies. The 103rd Amendment introduced a 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in the general category. These measures underscore the state's commitment to social justice, yet their implementation often grapples with systemic inefficiencies and political dynamics.

Caste remains the trump card in India's political playbook, with every party, regardless of ideology, leveraging it when convenient. The challenge lies in ensuring that caste-based policies translate into genuine empowerment rather than perpetual polarisation. Until then, the game will continue, with politicians as its eternal players.

 

 Terrorism Unmasked: Pakistan’s Global Menace Exposed

India’s diplomatic offensive has laid bare Pakistan’s decades-long patronage of terrorism, a truth echoed from Berlin to Seoul and Doha. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar’s blunt assertion that terrorism is an “open business” in Pakistan, financed and orchestrated by its state and military, underscores a grim reality the world can no longer ignore. Another delegate’s analogy of “breeding a snake in your backyard” captures the peril of tolerating Pakistan’s duplicity, where terror groups operate with impunity. Qatar’s endorsement of India’s zero-tolerance policy adds weight to the global consensus: Pakistan’s actions threaten not just regional but international security.

The pattern is undeniable. Osama bin Laden was found in Abbottabad; UN-designated terrorists roam freely in Pakistani cities; and cross-border attacks like Pahalgam persist. Yet, Pakistan’s economy crumbles while India ascends, exposing its reliance on terrorism as a desperate tool to undermine its neighbour’s progress. Jaishankar’s dismissal of nuclear hysteria—a Western fixation—reveals a deeper malaise: the normalisation of Pakistan’s terror infrastructure under the guise of geopolitical balancing. When India retaliated with precision airstrikes, it sent a clear message: terrorism carries a price.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, leading another Indian delegation in the U.S., reinforced this narrative, branding Pakistan a "revisionist power" that destabilises the region through cross-border terror. In contrast, he termed India a "status-quo power" committed to peaceful development, underscoring how Pakistan’s obsession with undermining its neighbour has left it internationally isolated. "Pakistan is not a normal state," Tharoor asserted, highlighting its refusal to accept India’s rise without resorting to violence—a tactic that has only hastened its own decline.

What defies logic is the world’s intermittent ambivalence. Despite evidence, some nations hesitate to hold Pakistan accountable, whether due to strategic myopia or misplaced alliances. The warning of Indian delegates on their world tour rings true: endorsing Pakistan is endorsing terror.

After decades of being dubbed as a “dangerous place,” by the late U.S. diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski, due to its volatile mix of nuclear proliferation, militant havens, and institutional instability, little has changed—Pakistan’s military establishment continues to shelter terrorists, from the Taliban to Lashkar-e-Taiba, while its economy teeters on collapse. Washington’s periodic reliance on Islamabad for geopolitical leverage has often blurred its stance, but the reality remains: a state that nurtures terror as policy is a global liability. Its military-terror nexus thrives, sabotaging peace and prosperity. India’s message is unequivocal: the world must choose between tolerating a rogue state or safeguarding collective security. The time for excuses is over; the snake in Pakistan’s backyard has bitten too many. Global inaction only emboldens it. India’s resolve, backed by growing international support, must catalyze decisive action to dismantle this terror ecosystem once and for all.

 Odisha’s Elephants in Peril: A Legacy Under Threat

Since time immemorial, it has been the land of elephants. The state’s kings bear the title of Gajapati (lord of elephants), and forests like Chandaka have long served as abodes for these majestic creatures. Yet, today, elephants are dying at an alarming rate, with little accountability for their deaths.

According to Forest, Environment and Climate Change Minister Ganesh Ram Singkhuntia, a staggering 888 elephants perished in Odisha over the past 11 years. The causes range from diseases (306 deaths) and electrocution (158) to poaching (33) and train accidents (29). Shockingly, the cause of death for 100 elephants remains unknown.

The current financial year (2024-25) has been particularly devastating, with 97 elephants dead in just 11 months—the highest annual toll in the state’s history. Equally tragic is the human cost: 1,209 people have died in elephant attacks during the same period.

Electrocution remains a leading threat, accounting for nearly 30% of recent deaths. Between April and July 2024 alone, eight elephants died due to electrocution, half of which were deliberate acts. Despite over ₹700 crore allocated to secure power lines, enforcement remains weak. In 2017, five elephants were electrocuted in Dhenkanal due to a sagging wire—one of India’s worst such incidents.

Odisha’s 1,976 elephants (as per the 2017 census) frequently clash with humans as habitats shrink. The state recorded 148 human deaths in 2022-23, the highest in India despite having fewer elephants than Karnataka or Assam. Activists blame the lack of migration corridors, stating, “The government is failing both elephants and people.”

The Orissa High Court recently took suo motu cognisance of elephant deaths, demanding action from the state. Yet, past measures have fallen short. Since 2010, 213 elephants have died due to electrocution, despite a central inquiry recommending preventive steps.

Some global and national conservation models offer hope. In Africa, dedicated anti-poaching units have curbed elephant killings, while in Thailand, successful eco-tourism initiatives provide sustainable habitats for elephants. In India, the Rajaji and Mudumalai National Parks have demonstrated effective coexistence strategies by creating dedicated elephant corridors and strengthening community involvement in conservation. Replicating these measures in Odisha, alongside stricter law enforcement and increased local engagement, could help reverse the crisis.

Odisha’s elephants—once symbols of royal power—now face extinction due to human negligence. Strengthening enforcement, securing power lines, and creating safe corridors are critical. Without immediate intervention, the Gajapati legacy may soon be reduced to a tragic footnote in history.

 

 Rising Power: India’s Economic Ascent and Challenges

India’s recent milestone of overtaking Japan to become the world’s fourth-largest economy, with a GDP of $4 trillion, is a testament to its steady economic progress. This achievement, highlighted by NITI Aayog CEO BVR Subrahmanyam, reflects the resilience and potential of an economy. The IMF projects India’s growth to be at 6.2% in 2025, even as global uncertainties persist. With ambitions to become a $10 trillion economy by 2035 and a $30 trillion developed nation by 2047, India’s trajectory seems promising. Yet, these macro figures mask stark ground realities—persistent inequality, unemployment, and poverty—raising questions about inclusive growth.

India’s economic history is a tale of resurgence. Before colonial rule, it accounted for nearly 25% of global GDP, but the wealth drain under British rule reduced it to a struggling economy. Socialist policies post-1947, while well-intentioned, led to the "Hindu Rate of Growth"—a stagnant 3-4% annual GDP expansion for decades. The 1991 liberalisation reforms marked a turning point, unleashing private enterprise and global integration, setting the stage for today’s ascent.

The numbers themselves are impressive. India’s nominal GDP has doubled from $2.1 trillion in 2014 to $4.2 trillion in 2024, and per capita income has risen from $1,438 to $2,880 in the same period. This growth, fueled by demographic dividends, digital transformation, and policy reforms like GST and production-linked incentives, positions India as a global bright spot. The government’s "Viksit Bharat 2047" vision outlines strategic interventions across six pillars, including technology leadership and sustainable development, aiming to elevate India to a high-income status.

However, the celebration of aggregate growth must be tempered by the lived experiences of millions. Despite being the fourth-largest economy, India ranks 134th in per capita income (World Bank, 2023), highlighting the disparity between size and prosperity. Unemployment remains a concern, with the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) reporting a 7.6% jobless rate in early 2025. Informal sector workers, who constitute over 80% of the workforce, face precarious conditions, and rural distress persists due to agrarian challenges. The World Inequality Lab notes that the top 1% of Indians hold 40% of national wealth, underscoring deep inequities.

The $10 trillion aspiration demands more than GDP expansion—it requires addressing structural flaws. Skilling the youth, boosting manufacturing (currently 17% of GDP), and improving ease of doing business are critical. Equally vital are investments in health, education, and social safety nets to ensure that growth benefits all. As economist Jean Drèze warns, "Growth without redistribution is like a train leaving behind most passengers."

India’s economic rise is undeniable, but its true test lies in translating macro gains into micro welfare. The journey to $10 trillion must bridge the gap between boardrooms and villages, ensuring prosperity is shared, not just showcased.

 

Immigration Now: From Economic Myths to Modern Realities

Immigration has long been a lens through which societies view their economic and cultural fates. Historically, it was branded as a harbinger of economic misery for local labor, with immigrants seen as competitors bringing fresh motivation and skills to outpace native workers. Yet, empirical studies have consistently debunked this notion, showing that immigrants often complement rather than displace local economies. In the U.S., former President Donald Trump took a hardline stance, enacting policies like the 2017 travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries and pushing for a border wall with Mexico, arguing that unchecked immigration threatened American prosperity and security. Today, a new economic critique has surfaced: immigration as a driver of soaring house prices, squeezing locals out of affordable living. This shift reflects not just economic anxieties but the enduring complexity of a phenomenon as old as humanity itself.

From ancient migrations to modern borders, immigration has shaped civilizations. Its current face varies starkly by nation. Japan, a homogenous society, has long resisted newcomers, prioritizing cultural unity. Yet, with an ageing population and shrinking workforce, it’s softening its stance, cautiously welcoming foreign labor to sustain its economy. India, by contrast, grapples with infiltration rather than immigration. The influx of Bangladeshis and Rohingyas has ignited debate over security and identity, yet efforts to curb it falter—perhaps due to India’s cultural reflex to embrace all comers. In the U.S., voices like Trump’s amplify a different fear. Some American politicians, echoing his rhetoric, claim, “If we import the third world, we will become the third world,” tying immigration to a perceived decline in national stature.

These economic and cultural arguments often oversimplify a nuanced reality. House prices may spike in immigrant-rich areas, but so do demand for goods, services, and innovation—benefits drowned out by populist noise. Japan’s pragmatic shift proves even insular societies can adapt when pressed. India’s struggle shows the tension between openness and control. The U.S., meanwhile, wrestles with its identity as a nation of immigrants now wary of them.

A path forward lies in evidence and adaptability. Nations should invest in data to unpack immigration’s true impacts—on housing, wages, and more—replacing fear with facts. Tailored policies could follow: Japan might expand skilled migration while guarding its culture; India could bolster borders without losing its inclusive soul; the U.S. might balance security with its historic openness. Immigration’s face keeps evolving, but with reason and flexibility, societies can harness its potential, bridging their past and future.

 

 Tackling Urban Flooding

 

As monsoon approaches, Bhubaneswar once again grapples with the recurring menace of urban flooding, a problem that has become a hallmark of unplanned urbanisation and climate volatility. The recent inspection by Principal Secretary Usha Padhee underscores the urgency to address this issue holistically, combining engineering solutions, ecological restoration, and community participation. The focus on key drainage channels like the Ganguanala and Daya West Canal highlights the need to restore natural water flow and remove structural barriers, but the challenge runs deeper.

The roots of Bhubaneswar’s flooding lie in haphazard construction, encroachment of water bodies, and silt-clogged drains, as highlighted in reports. Rapid urbanisation has replaced permeable surfaces with concrete, disrupting natural drainage and exacerbating runoff. The city’s colonial-era drainage system, designed for a smaller population, is now overwhelmed. Similar patterns are visible across India—Mumbai’s annual deluges, Chennai’s 2015 catastrophe, and Bengaluru’s recent waterlogging woes—all stem from unchecked development and vanishing wetlands. Globally, cities like Houston, Jakarta, and Bangkok face analogous crises, where urban sprawl and poor planning amplify flood risks. Globally, urban flooding has surged due to climate change and poor planning. Cities like New York, Paris, and Guangzhou face increasing flood risks from extreme rainfall and rising sea levels. The 2021 floods in Germany and China's 'sponge city' initiative highlight the need for adaptive infrastructure. Bhubaneswar must learn from these examples to build resilience.

Bhubaneswar’s unprecedented growth, driven by its emergence as an education and IT hub, has come at a cost. The city’s urban architecture, characterised by concrete-dominated landscapes, lacks climate-responsive design. Traditional water-harvesting systems and natural drainage channels have been neglected in favour of rapid infrastructure expansion. Climate change has further intensified the problem, with erratic rainfall patterns leading to heavier downpours in shorter durations. The city’s planners must now prioritise sponge city principles—incorporating permeable pavements, green roofs, and urban wetlands—to absorb excess rainwater.

The way forward demands a multi-pronged approach. IIT Bhubaneswar’s innovation of pervious concrete pavements, which allow water infiltration, is a promising step. Such green infrastructure must be scaled alongside traditional measures like desilting and drain expansion. Equally critical is enforcing zoning laws to prevent encroachments and reviving water bodies as natural buffers. Community awareness and participatory governance can ensure sustained efforts, as flooding is not just an engineering failure but a systemic one.

Bhubaneswar’s aspiration to become a flood-resilient city hinges on translating inspections into actionable, time-bound plans. The monsoon clock is ticking, and the city’s response will test its commitment to sustainable urbanism. The lessons are clear: without integrating ecology into development, even the smartest cities will keep sinking. The time for reactive measures is over; Bhubaneswar must embrace proactive, climate-smart urban planning to safeguard its future.

 The Arrest of Duterte by the ICJ – A Step Toward Justice, But Hypocrisy Lingers

The arrest of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is a landmark moment in the fight for global accountability. Duterte, infamous for his brutal "war on drugs," faces charges of crimes against humanity for the extrajudicial killings of thousands during his presidency. The ICJ’s indictment alleges that he incited violence, fostered a culture of impunity, and failed to prosecute perpetrators, leading to an estimated 12,000 to 30,000 deaths. This case sends a powerful message: no leader is above the law. Yet, it also exposes the glaring double standards of international justice, particularly when compared to the impunity enjoyed by other leaders accused of similar crimes.

Duterte’s arrest echoes past efforts to hold authoritarian leaders accountable. Slobodan Milošević, the former Serbian president, was tried by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity during the Balkan conflicts. His trial was historic, marking the first time a former head of state faced such charges. However, his death in prison in 2006, before the trial concluded, left justice incomplete. Similarly, Charles Taylor, Liberia’s former president, was convicted in 2012 by the Special Court for Sierra Leone for atrocities committed during Sierra Leone’s civil war. These cases set important precedents but remain rare exceptions in a world where many dictators evade accountability. The Nuremberg Trials, which held Nazi leaders accountable after World War II, laid the foundation for modern international justice, proving that even the most powerful can be brought to justice. Yet, decades later, the promise of Nuremberg remains unevenly applied.

While Duterte’s arrest is a victory for justice, it highlights the hypocrisy of selective enforcement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for example, has been accused of war crimes and human rights violations related to Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank. Yet, he remains untouched by international courts, shielded by powerful allies and geopolitical interests. This inconsistency undermines the credibility of institutions like the ICJ and fuels perceptions that international justice is wielded as a political tool rather than a universal principle.

The ICJ’s action against Duterte is a step forward, but it must be part of a broader, more consistent effort to hold all leaders accountable, regardless of their power or political connections. True justice requires courage and impartiality. Until the Netanyahus of the world face the same scrutiny as the Dutertes and Miloševićs, the promise of international justice will remain unfulfilled. The world is watching, and the stakes for global accountability have never been higher.

 

 Harvard's Crisis: Trump's Foreign Student Ban

Harvard University, one of the world’s most prestigious academic institutions, has long been a beacon for international students, fostering global intellectual exchange since its founding in 1636. Over the centuries, it has welcomed scholars from across the world, with its international student population growing significantly in the 20th and 21st centuries. Today, nearly 12% of Harvard’s student body comprises foreign nationals, including a substantial number from India, China, and other countries. This tradition of inclusivity, however, now faces an unprecedented challenge following an executive order by former President Donald Trump, revoking Harvard’s right to enrol foreign students unless it meets stringent new conditions.

The Trump administration’s directive, announced abruptly, has drawn sharp criticism and legal pushback. Harvard has filed a lawsuit against the order, calling it "arbitrary and discriminatory," while different media outlets report that university president Alan Garber condemned the move as an attack on academic freedom. The administration’s rationale hinges on national security concerns, though critics argue it is politically motivated, continuing Trump’s hardline stance on immigration. The implications are particularly severe for Indian students, who form one of the largest international cohorts at Harvard. According to media reports, around 800 Indian students currently enrolled at Harvard now face uncertainty, with potential visa revocations and disrupted academic trajectories.

For India, the fallout is significant. Harvard has long been a coveted destination for Indian scholars, with alumni including prominent figures in business, politics, and academia. The sudden policy shift not only jeopardises the futures of current students but also discourages future applicants, potentially reshaping the flow of Indian talent to American universities. The Trump administration’s harsh stance may also stem from personal grievances. Speculation swirls on social media that Barron Trump’s alleged rejection by Harvard fueled the order, though no evidence confirms this. If true, it reflects a troubling politicisation of education, where policy becomes retaliation. Historically, Harvard’s relationship with India has been deep, from hosting leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru to collaborating on cutting-edge research. The Trump order threatens to sever this intellectual bridge, reinforcing perceptions of U.S. hostility toward foreign students under restrictive immigration policies.

The broader ramifications extend beyond India. Harvard’s lawsuit underscores the tension between federal authority and institutional autonomy, setting a precedent that could affect other universities reliant on international enrollment. If upheld, the order may accelerate the decline of the U.S. as the preferred destination for global education, with students turning to alternatives in Canada, Europe, or Australia. For now, Harvard’s fight symbolises a larger battle over the values of openness and meritocracy that have defined American higher education for generations—a battle whose outcome will resonate far beyond its ivy-covered walls.

 

 China’s AI Boom: A Global Game-Changer 

China’s artificial intelligence (AI) sector is experiencing an unprecedented surge, with companies like DeepSeek and Butterfly Effect leading the charge. Manus is but the latest example of the mania that has swept over China. This boom is not only reshaping China’s tech landscape but also sending ripples across global markets. DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, has gained international attention with its cost-effective and powerful models, challenging Western counterparts like OpenAI. The company’s open-source models, which can be freely used and modified, are particularly appealing to developers worldwide. 

The impact of this AI frenzy is evident in China’s financial markets. The Hang Seng Tech Index has surged by over 40% since mid-January, reflecting investor optimism. Chinese tech giants such as Tencent, Alibaba, and Baidu are integrating DeepSeek’s technology into their products, despite having their own AI models. This widespread adoption is driving significant investments in cloud computing and data centres, with Alibaba pledging $53 billion over the next three years to meet the growing demand for AI cloud services. 

The enthusiasm for AI extends beyond the private sector. Chinese city governments are embedding DeepSeek’s models into mobile applications for public services, while state-owned enterprises and universities explore its potential for various applications, including “party building” activities. This broad-based adoption underscores the strategic importance of AI in China’s economic and political agenda. 

Globally, DeepSeek’s open-source models are gaining traction. Western companies, including European banks like Natwest and HSBC, are experimenting with these models due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness. However, security concerns and geopolitical tensions are influencing adoption rates. The White House is considering restrictions on DeepSeek’s models on national security grounds, which could limit their use in the U.S. In contrast, European companies, wary of over-reliance on American tech, may find DeepSeek’s offerings a viable alternative. 

Despite the excitement, some investors and analysts caution against a potential bubble in China’s AI sector. The rapid influx of capital into AI startups, coupled with speculative investments, raises concerns about sustainability. However, the prevailing sentiment is that AI represents a critical frontier for innovation and economic growth, making it a necessary gamble for many investors. 

China’s AI boom is a testament to the country’s ambition to become a global leader in technology. While challenges and uncertainties remain, the rapid advancements and widespread adoption of AI technologies like DeepSeek’s models are reshaping industries and markets, both in China and abroad. As the world watches this AI revolution unfold, the balance between innovation, security, and economic strategy will be crucial in determining its long-term impact. The global AI race is intensifying, with China positioning itself as a formidable competitor to Western tech giants. As DeepSeek and other Chinese AI firms continue to innovate and expand their influence, the world is witnessing a transformative shift in the technological landscape, driven by both opportunity and geopolitical dynamics.

 Steel Dreams: The Odisha Investment Conundrum

 

Odisha’s latest industrial spectacle, featuring Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi unveiling projects worth ₹1.15 lakh crore and promising 36,000 jobs, is a familiar script. The grand announcements, the gleaming foundation stones, and the rhetoric of transformation echo decades of similar promises that have often dissolved into disillusionment. From Janaki Ballav Pattanaik’s “1000 industries in 1000 days” to Biju Pattanaik’s unfulfilled steel plant dreams, and Naveen Patnaik’s memorandums of understanding (MOUs) that rarely materialised, Odisha’s history is littered with ambitious projects that stalled at the drawing board.

The collapse of POSCO’s $12 billion steel plant in 2017, after years of delays and protests, remains a stark reminder of the gap between promise and reality. Similarly, ArcelorMittal’s exit in 2013, citing land acquisition and ore linkage hurdles, exposed the systemic challenges plaguing large-scale investments. These episodes underscore a recurring pattern: high-profile MOUs and foundation ceremonies generate headlines, but ground realities—bureaucratic inertia, environmental clearances, land disputes, and political volatility—often derail progress.

Majhi’s current announcements, including TATA Steel’s expansion and foreign investments from Germany and Japan, are undoubtedly significant. Yet, scepticism is warranted. The state’s industrial policy has long prioritised spectacle over sustainability, with successive governments treating investment summits as public relations exercises rather than opportunities for systemic reform. The Make-in-Odisha Conclave, for instance, has consistently produced staggering investment figures on paper, but tangible outcomes remain elusive.

The broader issue lies in Odisha’s failure to address structural impediments. Land acquisition remains a quagmire, infrastructure gaps persist, and bureaucratic red tape stifles execution. Moreover, the emphasis on capital-intensive mega-projects often overshadows the need for nurturing micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), which are critical for inclusive growth. While Majhi’s speech invoked “downstream industrial growth” and MSME collaboration, past experience suggests such rhetoric rarely translates into actionable policies. Majhi’s recent vow to ensure “every district in Odisha has an industrial project” reflects a commendable vision for decentralised growth. However, without addressing the systemic bottlenecks that have historically plagued project execution, such promises risk becoming yet another addition to the state’s long list of unmet industrial aspirations.

For Odisha’s youth, who are repeatedly promised employment windfalls, these announcements ring hollow without delivery. The state’s aspiration to become an industrial powerhouse is laudable, but it demands more than ceremonial groundwork. It requires transparent governance, streamlined processes, and accountability mechanisms to ensure projects move beyond MOUs. Until then, the cycle of hype and disappointment will continue, leaving Odisha’s industrial potential perpetually in the future tense. The true test of Majhi’s leadership will be whether these projects join the ranks of POSCO and ArcelorMittal as cautionary tales or finally break the mould to become transformative realities.

Trouble in Turkey: Has Erdogan Crossed the Rubicon?

 

With Turkish authorities detaining 37 people for sharing “provocative” content on social media and pressing ahead with a crackdown on dissenting voices that escalated with the arrest of the mayor of Istanbul, a potential challenger to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkiye appears to be heading towards turmoil in the coming days. Mayor Imamoglu was arrested after a dawn raid on his residence on Wednesday as part of investigations into alleged corruption and terror links. Several other prominent figures, including two district mayors, were also detained. The detention of a popular opposition leader and key Erdogan rival deepened concerns over democracy and sparked protests in Istanbul and elsewhere, despite a four-day ban on demonstrations in the city and road closures. Several people were detained following a student protest in the capital, Ankara, that continued into the night. It also caused a shockwave in the financial market, triggering temporary halts in trading to prevent panic selling. 

Critics see the crackdown as an effort by Erdogan to extend his more than two-decade rule following significant losses by the ruling party in local elections last year. Government officials reject claims that legal actions against opposition figures are politically motivated and insist that the courts operate independently. Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya said authorities identified 261 social media accounts that shared provocative posts inciting public hatred or crime, including 62 run by people based abroad. At least 37 of the suspected owners were detained in an operation by police and cybercrime teams, he wrote on the X social media platform. Efforts to detain other suspects were continuing, he said. 

Imamoglu's arrest came just days before he was expected to be nominated as the opposition Republican People's Party's presidential candidate in a primary scheduled for Sunday. The party's leader has said the primary will go ahead as planned. Prosecutors accused Imamoglu of exploiting his position for financial gain, including the improper allocation of government contracts. In a separate investigation, prosecutors also accuse Imamoglu of aiding the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, by allegedly forming an alliance with a Kurdish umbrella organisation for the Istanbul municipal elections. The PKK, behind a decades-long insurgency in Turkiye, is designated a terrorist organisation by Ankara, Washington, and other allies. It seems Imamoglu could be removed from office and replaced by a “trustee mayor” if he is formally charged with links to the PKK. 

Before his detention, Imamoglu already faced multiple criminal cases that could result in prison sentences and a political ban. Recently, a university nullified his diploma, barring him from running for president. Imamoglu was elected mayor of Turkiye's largest city in March 2019, a historic blow to Erdogan. These sudden developments suggest another Arab Spring-like situation is imminent in Turkey.

 Jayant Narlikar: A Stellar Scientific Legacy

The passing of Jayant Narlikar at 86 marks the end of an era in Indian science. An astrophysicist of global repute, a gifted science communicator, and a bold challenger of mainstream cosmology, Narlikar’s contributions transcended academia, leaving an indelible mark on research and public discourse in India. Born in 1938 in Kolhapur, his brilliance was evident early, graduating from Banaras Hindu University at 20 and earning his PhD at 24 under the legendary Fred Hoyle at Cambridge. His work with Hoyle on the steady-state theory, an alternative to the Big Bang, showcased his willingness to question established norms, a trait that defined his career.

Narlikar’s research spanned cosmology, gravity, and interstellar matter, but his most enduring legacy may be his role in building India’s astrophysics infrastructure. Returning to India in 1972, he founded the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA) in Pune, which became a hub for world-class research and nurtured generations of scientists. His leadership democratized access to advanced tools, ensuring Indian researchers no longer needed to go abroad for cutting-edge work. Beyond the lab, Narlikar was a prolific writer, penning over 40 books in English and Marathi, blending science with fiction and philosophy to make complex ideas accessible. His Marathi science fiction, like Yantrikarache Ambadnya, inspired countless young minds to pursue science.

A staunch advocate for rationalism, Narlikar debunked pseudoscience and superstition, embodying the spirit of inquiry. His debates with proponents of fringe theories were sharp yet courteous, reflecting his belief that science thrives on evidence, not dogma. Though his steady-state model eventually lost ground to the Big Bang, his insistence on questioning orthodoxy remains a lesson for the scientific community. Even in later years, he remained intellectually active, engaging with new astrophysical theories and mentoring young researchers.

Narlikar’s influence extended beyond academia—he shaped science policy and education, advocating for stronger research funding and critical thinking in schools. His popular lectures and TV appearances made astrophysics relatable, proving science need not be confined to elite circles. Even in dissent, his rigour earned respect, cementing his place as one of India’s most revered scientific minds.

Narlikar’s awards—Padma Vibhushan, UNESCO’s Kalinga Prize, and the Maharashtra Bhushan—only hint at his influence. More profound was his ability to bridge the gap between esoteric research and public imagination, making him a rare scientist-celebrity in India. His death leaves a void, but his legacy—of curiosity, courage, and commitment to science as a public good—will endure. In a nation still grappling with a scientific temper, Narlikar’s life stands as a beacon. His work reminds us that true progress lies not just in discovery but in the relentless pursuit of truth, no matter how unconventional the path.

 On Track: Unveiling the Future of Bhubaneswar and Cuttack's Metro Journey

 

The metro rail project in Bhubaneswar is poised to transform Odisha’s urban landscape, as emphasised by Minister Krushna Chandra Mohapatra and the Chief Minister’s recent initiatives. The proposed metro, originally a 26-km stretch between Biju Patnaik International Airport (BIA) and Trisulia in Cuttack, is undergoing route revisions with an expert committee’s input. With Rs 6,225 crore allocated, the project aims to enhance connectivity, ease traffic congestion, and elevate residents’ quality of life. The Chief Minister underscored its role in economic growth, highlighting its modern, eco-friendly transport potential. Phase 1, spanning 26 kilometres with 20 stations, will link key hubs like the airport and railway stations, with construction starting by November 20, 2023, and aiming for completion by 2027. Plans to extend services to Cuttack and an elevated corridor on Jayadev Vihar-Nandankanan Road are also in motion. 

India’s recent metro projects provide valuable lessons for Bhubaneswar. Delhi’s metro, operational since 2002, now covers over 390 km and is a global benchmark for seamless integration, despite early hurdles like land acquisition delays. Mumbai’s metro, launched in 2014, spans 70 km and has alleviated urban congestion, with Phase 1 completed ahead of schedule due to efficient public-private partnerships. Hyderabad’s metro, starting in 2017, covers 69 km and is celebrated for its sleek design and rapid execution, supported by meticulous planning. Thiruvananthapuram’s metro, however, offers a more cautionary tale. Approved in 2022, the 27.4-km project with 21 stations faced significant delays due to funding issues and environmental concerns, particularly over its alignment through ecologically sensitive areas. While its first phase is now underway with a budget of Rs 6,728 crore, progress has been slower than Hyderabad’s, underscoring the need for robust financial planning and stakeholder consensus—lessons Bhubaneswar can heed. 

The Bhubaneswar-Cuttack metro presents both opportunities and challenges. The planned elevated corridor and vehicular integration reflect strategic foresight, but the need for a revised detailed project report (DPR) indicates a careful approach to ensure viability, unlike the smoother rollouts in Delhi or Hyderabad. With Rs 210 crore allocated for 2023-24 and Rs 1,000 crore sanctioned this financial year (Rs 393 crore spent), momentum is building. However, coordinating urban dynamics between Bhubaneswar and Cuttack will be key, especially given Thiruvananthapuram’s delays over alignment disputes. The Chief Minister’s push to expedite construction and the operational target within a few years signals ambition. 

In conclusion, Bhubaneswar’s metro, backed by significant investment and inspired by successful Indian metros, is on a promising path. By learning from Thiruvananthapuram’s challenges and emulating Hyderabad’s efficiency, Odisha can ensure this project reshapes its urban future effectively.

 Polavaram Progress: A New Dawn for Odisha’s Disputes

The Polavaram dam dispute, festering for nearly two decades, symbolises Odisha’s broader struggle to protect its territorial and riparian rights. Recent reports of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s proposed discussion with Odisha’s chief secretary have injected fresh optimism into this long-pending issue. This intervention is particularly significant as the previous BJD government faced persistent allegations of deliberate inaction, allowing the conflict to fester in legal quagmires while Andhra Pradesh accelerated construction. The current BJP-led administration’s assertive posture, combined with central engagement, could break this stalemate, not just for Polavaram but also for Odisha’s other inter-state conflicts, from the Mahanadi water dispute to volatile border rows.

At the heart of the Polavaram controversy lies the threat of large-scale submergence. The dam’s backwaters could inundate over 6,000 acres in Odisha’s tribal-dominated Malkangiri district, displacing thousands. Despite being declared a “national project” in 2014, the unresolved inter-state objections forced Odisha, Chhattisgarh, and Telangana to approach the Supreme Court. The BJD government’s delayed legal response—filing its petition only in 2019, years after construction began—allowed Andhra Pradesh to create facts on the ground. The current Law Minister’s accusation of “political interests” stalling earlier action underscores this failure. Meanwhile, the BJD counters by citing its Delhi protests and tribal outreach, revealing how the issue remains politicised.

The Polavaram impasse mirrors Odisha’s other neglected disputes. The Mahanadi conflict with Chhattisgarh, where upstream dams drastically reduced water flow into Odisha, remains unresolved despite the formation of a tribunal. Recent appeals to the PM for intervention highlight growing desperation. Similarly, border disputes with Andhra Pradesh, where villages like Kotia cluster face dual claims, and West Bengal’s alleged encroachments near Balasore exemplify systemic apathy. Historical losses of Odia-majority areas (Sareikela, Kharsuan, and parts of Srikakulam) during state reorganisation amplify these anxieties.

The PM’s involvement could recalibrate this trajectory. A transparent, data-driven resolution for Polavaram—ensuring Odisha’s submergence concerns are addressed—would set a template for the Mahanadi talks. For border disputes, the Centre must enforce existing agreements (like the 1968 Odisha-AP accord) and expedite demarcation. However, lasting solutions require institutional mechanisms: permanent interstate river commissions, real-time water data sharing, and time-bound tribunals for border rows.

Odisha’s demands are not merely territorial; they reflect the existential threats faced by marginalised communities. Tribal villages facing submergence or farmers battling water scarcity cannot afford bureaucratic lethargy. As the state asserts its rights, the Centre must mediate with impartiality, ensuring cooperative federalism doesn’t become a zero-sum game. For Odisha, this moment is pivotal—an opportunity to secure its future by finally resolving the ghosts of its past.

 

 Restoring Law and Order in Odisha – A Call for Urgent Action

The recent spate of violent crimes in Odisha, particularly in the capital region, has raised serious concerns about the state of law and order in the state. Over the Holi festivities, Odisha witnessed a shocking wave of nine murders, including the killing of a businessman in Cuttack and a double murder in Bhubaneswar. These incidents, coupled with other crimes such as road accidents, drug trade, and crimes against women, paint a grim picture of the deteriorating security situation in the state. The fact that such heinous crimes occurred despite the police and intelligence agencies being on high alert raises questions about the effectiveness of the existing mechanisms to curb crime.

The Holi celebrations, traditionally a time of joy and camaraderie, were marred by bloodshed and violence. Cuttack, Sambalpur, Angul, and Berhampur emerged as hotspots for criminal activities, while even Mayurbhanj, a region known for its relatively low crime rate, reported three murders. The drowning of revellers during the festivities further highlights the lack of preparedness and enforcement of safety measures. It is deeply troubling that the state machinery, despite being aware of the potential for crime during such events, failed to prevent these incidents.

The situation is further exacerbated by other pressing law and order issues. Road accidents continue to claim lives at an alarming rate, while the drug trade is flourishing, particularly among the youth. Crimes against women remain a persistent challenge, with cases of harassment and assault frequently making headlines. Additionally, corruption among government employees continues to erode public trust in the administration. These problems, if left unaddressed, will only deepen the crisis of governance in the state.

The state government must take immediate and decisive action to restore public confidence. Strengthening the police force, improving intelligence gathering, and ensuring swift justice for victims should be top priorities. Community policing initiatives and increased surveillance in crime-prone areas could help deter criminal activities. Moreover, there is an urgent need to address the root causes of crime, such as unemployment, poverty, and social inequality.

The people of Odisha deserve to live in a safe and secure environment. It is the responsibility of the government to ensure that law and order are maintained, and that citizens can go about their lives without fear. The recent spate of crimes is a wake-up call for the administration to act with urgency and determination. Only by addressing these issues head-on can Odisha hope to regain its reputation as a peaceful and progressive state. The time for action is now.

 

 Judicial Accountability: Above the Law?

 The discovery of a substantial amount of cash at the official residence of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court has raised serious questions about judicial accountability and the integrity of India’s legal system. Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s recent remarks highlighting the need to revisit the Supreme Court’s 1991 judgment in the K Veeraswami case, which mandates prior sanction to prosecute judges, underscore a growing concern: are judges being treated as above the law? The delay in lodging an FIR, the lack of transparency in the investigation, and the judge’s flimsy explanation that he was unaware of how the money appeared in his house are deeply troubling. These developments suggest a systemic failure to hold the judiciary accountable, departing from established legal norms.

Dhankhar’s assertion that the criminal justice system should operate uniformly for all individuals, including judges, is rational and timely. The Veeraswami judgment, while aimed at protecting judicial independence, has arguably created a shield that allows misconduct to go unchecked. The Vice-President’s criticism of the in-house committee investigating the cash discovery case, questioning its constitutional validity and transparency, highlights the inadequacy of such mechanisms. When compared to how similar cases involving public servants or politicians are handled, the special treatment accorded to judges becomes glaringly apparent. The absence of an FIR months after the incident, coupled with the committee’s questionable actions like seizing electronic equipment from witnesses, further erodes public trust.

The issue is compounded by another systemic flaw: the prevalence of judicial dynasties in India. A significant proportion of judges appointed to higher courts have parents or close relatives who served as justices. This trend fosters an insular culture where professional bonds and familial ties may overshadow accountability. Such an environment risks creating a protective circle where lapses, regardless of gravity, are downplayed or ignored. The reluctance to act decisively in the cash discovery case fuels suspicions that the judiciary operates as a closed club, immune to the scrutiny faced by other public officials.

The broader question Dhankhar raises is whether the judiciary, tasked with upholding the rule of law, is itself adhering to it. The principle that no one is above the law is foundational to democracy. If judges are exempt from swift and transparent investigations, it undermines public confidence in the legal system. The Vice-President’s call for an “in-house regulatory mechanism” that is accountable and expeditious is a step in the right direction, but it must be accompanied by legislative and institutional reforms to ensure impartiality. 

India’s judiciary is at a crossroads. Judicial independence cannot mean judicial impunity. The Veeraswami judgment must be revisited to strike a balance between protecting judges from frivolous complaints and ensuring they are answerable for misconduct. 

 Intrepid Alliances in a World on the Brink: The Escalating Nuclear Threat

The nuclear threat facing the world today has reached a precarious juncture, exacerbated by shifting geopolitical dynamics and the intrepid recalibration of alliances. Current U.S. President Donald Trump’s foreign policy, marked by a transactional approach and a perceived retreat from NATO commitments, has left traditional allies in Europe and Asia grappling with uncertainty. This has not only strained transatlantic ties but also fueled a global arms race, with nuclear proliferation emerging as a grim possibility.

In Europe, the spectre of a U.S. withdrawal from NATO has prompted nations like England and France, already established nuclear powers, to reassess their strategic postures. France, under President Macron, has even floated the idea of extending its nuclear umbrella to other European nations, signalling a shift toward self-reliance in defence. Germany, traditionally a non-nuclear state, has also entered discussions about nuclear sharing, reflecting the continent’s growing unease. Such moves, while aimed at deterrence, risk escalating tensions and undermining the fragile architecture of non-proliferation.

Across Asia, the situation is equally fraught. Japan and South Korea, long reliant on the U.S. nuclear umbrella, are now contemplating their own nuclear capabilities. This shift is driven by fears of abandonment and the aggressive posturing of North Korea, whose nuclear ambitions remain unchecked. The possibility of these nations joining the nuclear club could trigger a domino effect, destabilising the region and eroding decades of non-proliferation efforts.

Meanwhile, the usual suspects—North Korea, Iran, and Russia—continue to pose significant threats. North Korea’s relentless missile tests and Iran’s nuclear brinkmanship have kept the Middle East and East Asia on edge. Russia’s actions in Ukraine, including veiled nuclear threats, have further lowered the threshold for nuclear use, setting a dangerous precedent. The alliance between these states, along with China, adds another layer of complexity, challenging global stability.

The world was already a hostage to the uncertainty and impasse of the Cold War when near-miss incidents like the Cuban Missile Crisis brought humanity perilously close to annihilation. Is such a grave threat looming again today?

The outcome of this imbroglio is deeply uncertain. On one hand, the proliferation of nuclear weapons could lead to a precarious balance of power, where mutual deterrence prevents outright conflict. On the other hand, it risks catastrophic miscalculations and an arms race that could spiral out of control. The erosion of trust among allies and the weakening of international institutions like NATO and the United Nations only exacerbate these risks.

In this volatile landscape, the world must navigate with caution. Strengthening diplomatic channels, reaffirming commitments to non-proliferation, and fostering international cooperation are imperative. The untiring pursuit of peace and stability, despite the odds, remains humanity’s best hope against the looming nuclear threat.

 

Absolute Truths: Unshackling the Colonial Mindset

For centuries, the Western narrative has been held as the gold standard of truth, objectivity, and rationality, while indigenous perspectives have been dismissed as backwards or unreliable. This ingrained bias is a lingering legacy of colonial rule, where the British systematically cultivated the idea that Western thought was superior, scientific, and unbiased, while local knowledge was suspect. Even our rediscovery of India’s ancient wisdom—whether Ayurveda, philosophy, or mathematics—gained legitimacy only after Western scholars like Max Müller "validated" it. Our own heritage needed a foreign stamp of approval to be deemed worthy. This psychological conditioning persists today, shaping not just media consumption but also our worldview, scientific temper, and even military assessments.

The recent Western media response to India’s Operation Sindoor against Pakistan is a glaring example—despite evidence, major media outlets in the West have rushed to discredit India’s claims, framing them as exaggerated or false. The pattern is unmistakable: any assertion of Indian capability is met with scepticism unless validated by Western sources. This is not accidental. The global military-industrial complex thrives on the myth of Western invincibility. If India’s defence successes—be it precision strikes or drone neutralisation—are acknowledged, it challenges the carefully constructed narrative of Western supremacy in warfare technology. Notably, many of these dismissive reports are penned by journalists with Indian names, lending them an air of credibility. This is a calculated move—using native voices to undermine native achievements, reinforcing the colonial hierarchy of truth.

Even in moments of national crisis, we instinctively turn to Western media for confirmation. When Indira Gandhi was assassinated, Rajiv Gandhi, then a young politician, first sought the BBC for updates—a telling reflection of ingrained trust in foreign narratives. Decades later, during conflicts like Operation Sindoor or even general elections, many still tune into the BBC or CNN, as if the truth is only credible when filtered through a Western lens. This reflexive dependence reveals how deeply colonial-era conditioning still governs our minds.

Breaking free from this mental subjugation requires conscious effort. First, Indians must recognise this systemic bias and question why Western validation is deemed essential. Second, media literacy is crucial—understanding that Western outlets, like any other, have geopolitical and economic interests. Third, India must invest in its own narrative-building institutions, fostering independent, evidence-based journalism that does not seek external approval. Finally, pride in indigenous knowledge systems—whether in defence, science, or culture—must be revived with the confidence to assess them critically.

The colonial hangover will persist until Indians stop measuring their worth through a Western lens. True intellectual decolonisation begins when we trust our own evidence, celebrate our successes without apology, and engage with the world as equals, not as seekers of validation.

 

Stranded in the Stars: The Saga of Endurance in Space Exploration

Sunita Williams, along with fellow astronaut Barry Wilmore, had remained stranded on the International Space Station (ISS) for nearly nine months, a situation that underscores the inherent uncertainties and risks of space exploration. Their extended stay, initially planned for a much shorter duration, was caused by technical issues with their return spacecraft, Boeing's Starliner. The capsule, which was supposed to bring them back to Earth, faced propulsion system malfunctions and helium leaks, raising concerns about its safety for re-entry. This delay highlights the precarious nature of space travel, where even the most meticulously planned missions can encounter unforeseen challenges.

The psychology of being stranded in space is a profound aspect of this ordeal. Williams and Wilmore had had to cope with the isolation, confinement, and the psychological toll of being far from Earth, knowing their return was uncertain. Living in microgravity, with limited personal space and the constant hum of machinery, can exacerbate feelings of detachment. Yet, both astronauts demonstrated remarkable resilience, continuing their scientific work and maintaining their morale. Their endurance is a testament to the rigorous training and mental fortitude required for space travel, as well as the human capacity to adapt to extreme environments.

Given the frequency of space missions, one might wonder why another rocket wasn’t sent to retrieve them sooner. However, space logistics is far more complex than it appears. Coordinating a rescue mission involves significant time, resources, and risk assessment. Sending another spacecraft would have required meticulous planning, ensuring compatibility with the ISS, and addressing potential safety concerns. Moreover, Williams and Wilmore were never in immediate danger; the ISS is well-equipped to support extended stays, and NASA prioritised their safety over a hasty return.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX has now emerged as a key player in their rescue, further cementing his influence in the space industry. SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsule, a reliable and proven vehicle, brought the astronauts home. Musk’s growing presence in space exploration reflects a shift in the industry, where private companies are increasingly taking the lead in what was once the exclusive domain of government agencies.

This incident offers a new perspective on the risks and realities of space travel. While advancements in technology have made space more accessible, it remains a hostile and unpredictable frontier. Williams and Wilmore’s ordeal reminds us of the courage and determination required to explore the cosmos. Their endurance, both physical and psychological, is a tribute to the human spirit’s ability to persevere in the face of adversity. As they have safely returned to Earth, their story serves as a powerful reminder of the challenges and triumphs of venturing into the last frontier.

 Refugees Adrift: India’s Rohingya Dilemma Deepens

The Rohingya crisis in India has escalated into a contentious international issue, with allegations of forced deportations and human rights abuses drawing sharp criticism. Recent reports claim that Indian authorities abandoned Rohingya refugees at sea, subjecting them to torture and inhumane treatment before pushing them back toward Myanmar. Advocacy groups like the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) have demanded an independent probe, while the UN has raised concerns over India's adherence to international refugee laws.

India has firmly rejected these accusations, asserting its sovereign right to manage borders and national security. Officials argue that the Rohingya, classified as illegal immigrants, pose a potential threat given the volatile situation in Myanmar, where the military junta continues to persecute the minority group, forcing them into squalid camps with little hope of return. India's relationship with Bangladesh, which hosts over a million Rohingya, further complicates the issue. While Dhaka seeks repatriation, Myanmar's refusal to guarantee their safety leaves both nations—and the refugees—in a protracted limbo.

The broader refugee problem underscores India's inconsistent policies. While the country has historically sheltered Tibetans and Sri Lankan Tamils, its treatment of the Rohingya has been marked by hostility, driven by political and security concerns. The situation mirrors India's long-standing challenge with Bangladeshi migrants, where porous borders have led to large-scale unauthorised migration over decades. As noted in India Foundation's analysis, this influx has strained resources, altered demographics in border states, and sparked security worries. The think tank suggests a multi-pronged approach: stronger border surveillance, bilateral agreements with Bangladesh for orderly repatriation, and a national refugee law to distinguish genuine asylum seekers from economic migrants—a framework that could also address the Rohingya predicament.

Without a formal asylum framework, refugees remain vulnerable to arbitrary detention and deportation. This approach not only invites global condemnation but also contradicts India's traditional advocacy for human rights. Balancing humanitarian obligations with security imperatives remains a challenge. As international pressure mounts, India must adopt a more transparent and principled stance, ensuring compliance with non-refoulement norms while addressing legitimate risks. A structured refugee policy could mitigate criticism and prevent further tragedies at sea, where desperation, much like that seen in other parts of the world, continues to claim lives. Until then, the Rohingya's suffering will remain a stain on India's moral conscience.

The sea incident serves as a grim reminder that without comprehensive solutions, vulnerable populations will continue to undertake perilous journeys. India, as an emerging global power, must lead with both strength and compassion, strengthening its borders while honouring its humanitarian traditions. The Rohingya crisis presents an opportunity to develop a fair, legally sound refugee policy that protects national interests without sacrificing human dignity. The world is watching.