Caste Politics: The Eternal Game of Power
Nothing suits
politicians and those in power more than the caste issue, a tool wielded with
precision for millennia. From ancient times to British rule, where "divide
and rule" thrived on caste divisions, it has been central to India's power
dynamics. In modern politics, caste equations dictate electoral strategies,
with parties exploiting them for gains. The Mandal Commission's aftermath
intensified this, embedding caste deeper into the political fabric. Now, Prime
Minister Narendra Modi's push for a caste-based census has outmanoeuvred the
opposition, forcing them to recalibrate their strategies.
The latest volley in this unending battle comes from Rahul Gandhi, who has reignited the debate with his "Not Found Suitable" (NFS) allegation. He claims that SC, ST, and OBC candidates are being systematically excluded from education and leadership roles under this pretext. While his charges are polemical, they are not new. Leaders like Union Minister and Apna Dal (S) President Anupriya Patel have previously flagged similar biases in government jobs. Gandhi's rhetoric, however, amplifies the narrative of constitutional betrayal, framing NFS as a modern-day "Manuvaad" undermining social justice.
Yet, such accusations
often overlook systemic complexities. The "not found suitable" tag
may reflect institutional inefficiencies rather than deliberate exclusion.
While vacant reserved posts in universities and IITs demand scrutiny, reducing
the issue to a BJP-RSS conspiracy oversimplifies it. Reservation was conceived
as a tool for empowerment, but its politicisation risks reducing it to a
tokenistic battleground.
The reservation system in India, designed as affirmative action to uplift
marginalised communities, has deep historical roots. Its genesis can be traced
back to 1882, when William Hunter and Jyotirao Phule advocated for educational
reservations. The British formalised this with the 1933 Communal Award,
introducing separate electorates for various communities. However, the Poona
Pact of 1932, an agreement between Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, led to
a unified Hindu electorate with reserved seats for the depressed classes.
Post-independence, the Indian Constitution enshrined provisions to address
historical injustices. Articles 15(4) and 16(4) empower the state to make
special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backwards
classes. Over time, amendments like the 77th, 81st, and 85th have expanded
reservations to include promotions and address unfilled vacancies. The 103rd
Amendment introduced a 10% quota for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in the
general category. These measures underscore the state's commitment to social
justice, yet their implementation often grapples with systemic inefficiencies
and political dynamics.
Caste remains the trump
card in India's political playbook, with every party, regardless of
ideology, leveraging it when convenient. The challenge lies in ensuring that
caste-based policies translate into genuine empowerment rather than perpetual
polarisation. Until then, the game will continue, with politicians as its
eternal players.
No comments:
Post a Comment